service genset jogja
Amos 1:2

When God Raises His Voice

I think it was C. S. Lewis who said that God speaks to us in our pleasure, but he screams at us in our pain. Pain is God’s megaphone. This might be one way to understand Amos 1:2. It says, “The LORD roars from Zion and utters his voice from Jerusalem; the pastures of the shepherds mourn, and the top of Carmel withers.” It sounds like the roaring voice of God comes in the form of pastures that mourn or don’t have any sheep. That Mount Carmel is withering might be understood as a time of great calamity. Reading the rest of Amos’ prophecy leads me to think that it might be just the opposite. Amos held no official title in Israel. He was just a Shepherd of Tekoa, and not a very significant one because the text points out that he was “just one of the many” among the shepherds of Tekoa. He was a common person, like you reading this and me writing this. Yet, he saw something that others could or would not see. The prophecy tells us that the words that come from Amos are words that he “saw,” not just heard. The words are described as those he saw during the reigns of Uzziah in Judah and Jeroboam II in the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The thing to notice about this timing is that it was the most prosperous time in both Nation’s histories.

It doesn’t take a college degree to recognize the similarities between Amos’ day and ours. We face very similar problems. Jesus himself addressed the dangers of prosperity on several occasions. He warns us much more about the dangers of pleasures than the dangers of pain. True, I’ve seen many who have turned from God because of pain in their lives, but I agree with John Piper, who says that more are lured away from God by their pleasures. Pleasures seldom awaken people to their need for God; pain often does.  The first danger of prosperity is complacency. I’ve seen many churches with huge endowments and debt-free buildings forget about why they exist and don’t care about being all that God intends them to be as a church. Another problem is arrogance. Prosperity often leads us to wrongly believe there is some kind of quality in us that makes us better than others. The third danger of Prosperity is self-sufficiency. Full barns often lead us to think we don’t need anyone, including God. All three of these dangers are addressed by Amos.

But Amos was alert to the fact that God wanted to break through all the luxury, financial security, and prosperity in the land. Thus, Amos tells us that “God Roars.”  A Study Bible says, “The Hebrew word for roars seems to compare thunder to God growling like a lion, the majestic king of beasts.”[1] Of all the things in that agricultural economy, that could not be ignored was a roaring lion. That’s the picture that Amos uses to describe God’s message to the healthy and wealthy nations. God must get loud to get our attention. God raises his voice because his children are distracted by their cell phones, fancy clothes, new cars, and comfortable homes. When God raises His voice, it does not bode well for his children. My mother used to say, “Wait till your father gets home.” But what was worse was when my father did get home, and he would raise his voice at us kids. We knew that he meant business. He would always scare us when he did that. We knew the next step would be the belt. “Jehovah will roar against them as a lion, terrible to shepherds and their flocks. His voice must be heard, and the message demands attention. God roars before he tears and warns before he strikes.”[2]

[1] Radmacher, Earl D., Ronald Barclay Allen, and H. Wayne House. 1997. The Nelson Study Bible: New King James Version. Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers.

[2] Wolfendale, James. 1892. Minor Prophets. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary. New York; London; Toronto: Funk & Wagnalls Company.

Luke 24:44-45, Various

An Open Mind

Jesus claimed to be the subject of all three major sections of the Old Testament. During His post-resurrection appearance to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, the text informs us that Jesus taught them how all the scriptures spoke about him “beginning with Moses and all the Prophets…” (Luke 24:27). This phrase captures the customary Jewish division of two of the three major parts of the Old Testament; the law and the prophets. But then, in Luke 24:44, Jesus adds the third section of the Old Testament: the writings. The writings include the Book of Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Song of Solomon, and the Psalms. The Psalms, being the largest part of the writings, is often used to refer to the entire collection of writings. This is how Jesus used it when He said, “These are my words that I spoke to you while I was still with you, that everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled.” The Old Testament, from Genesis to Malachi, speaks of the coming one who will deliver his people from their sins.

Now, to understand what Jesus meant in His New Testament teaching, we must be familiar with the Old Testament prophecies relating to the Messiah or we will make some serious mistakes. Many today have missed the point of Jesus’ words about being the subject of the whole Old Testament. He said some things in the New Testament that can only be understood with the Messianic Prophecies of the Old Testament in mind. On our trips to Israel, we always stop at the Church of the Primacy of St. Peter. This structure quotes Matthew 16:18 as being the basis upon which Peter is the first Pope and the foundation upon which Jesus will build his church. This verse says, “Thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church.” This interpretation leaves out the context of the conversation where Peter makes his great profession as Jesus being the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament. Peter’s recognition and acceptance of the fact that Jesus was the subject of the whole Old Testament is to receive Jesus as the Messiah. It’s Jesus’ complete fulfillment of all of the Old Testament prophecies that will form the foundation upon which the New Testament Church is going to be built.

Isaiah, the great Messianic Prophet, spoke for God in Isaiah 28:16. He said, “Behold, I am laying a stone in Zion, an approved stone, set in place as a precious cornerstone for the foundation.” Peter identified Jesus as the Messiah. Therefore, Peter recognized Jesus as the cornerstone upon which the church would be built. Peter never thought of himself as the rock upon which the church would be built. He said so himself in 1 Peter 2:6-7.  He  says, quoting the Isaiah passage, “For it stands in Scripture: Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone, a cornerstone chosen and precious, and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.” Peter knew the Old Testament and the messianic prophecies and didn’t fail to understand Jesus’ words in connection with the Law, the Prophets, and the writings.”  When Peter answered Jesus’ question, “Who do you say that I am?” Peter responded correctly, “You are the Messiah, the son of the living God.” Jesus then said that Peter didn’t grasp this truth in and of himself, but the Father had revealed it to him. When Jesus revealed Himself to the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, Luke 24:45 tells us that Jesus “opened their minds to understand the Scriptures…” Jesus still opens minds today when His teachings are taken in light of the Scriptures of the Old Testament.

Acts 20:35, Proverbs 30:15

Givers And Takers

If you have a red-letter version of the New Testament, you will see all the words of Jesus in Red print while the rest is in the usual black print. I was perusing one of those Bibles and was surprised to see red print, not only in the Gospels but also in the book of Acts. The last quote we have from Jesus is recorded for us in chapter 20 of the book of Acts. Acts 20:35 says, “In all things I have shown you that by working hard in this way we must help the weak and remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how he himself said, “It is more blessed to give than to receive.” I always smile when I read this verse because it reminds me of a joke. A professional boxer was converted to Christ.  He felt it was wrong to continue hitting people, but he only knew boxing as a profession.  When he sought counsel from the deacons in his church, one of them responded, “I Don’t see why you can’t continue.  The Bible says that it’s better to give than to receive.” Of course, we all know that’s not what Jesus meant.  I remember my mother telling me that one Halloween when I came back from fleecing the neighbors of all the candy I could fit in a pillowcase. My brother was too young to go out, and my mother wanted me to share my candy with him. When I hesitated to comply, she said those infamous words, “It’s more blessed to give than to receive.” I did not believe it, but in order to avoid a spanking, I listened to my mother and shared my candy with my little brother.

In his little book “Christian Living Beyond Belief,” McManis says, “God has commanded the church, and Christians in particular, to give. Jesus said, ‘Give’ (Luke 6:38). Paul commanded Christians to give financially to the church (1 Corinthians 16:1–4; Romans 12:8, 13). John exhorted believers to give to those in need (1 John 3:16–18). Hebrews 13:16 says God is pleased when we give to others. Giving is a basic Christian virtue. Giving to God and others reflects the very nature of God. God’s greatest act of loving sacrifice entailed an act of ‘giving’—‘for God so loved the world that He gave’ (John 3:16). One of the most telling barometers of a person’s spiritual maturity is their quotient for giving. God has repeatedly commanded Christians to be giving people, for they are recipients of the greatest gift ever given—salvation in Christ.

The wisest man in the world, Solomon, tells us that there are two kinds of people in the world: givers and takers!  Proverbs 30:15 says, “The leech has two daughters: Give and Give.”  The leech is a reference to the bloodsucking horseleech that was common in Palestine. The ugly creature serves as an emblem of insatiable greed. If it could speak, it would say, Give! Give! Give! The leech is like the fictitious vampire sucking the very lifeblood from all it comes in contact with.  Christians should be just the opposite! We should all be givers. Haley writes, “In this world, there are two kinds of people. Those who throw beer cans alongside the road and those who pick them up. That is, there are givers and takers. All true Christians are givers, but not all givers are Christians. Some give to the wrong people for the wrong reasons. For example, some may give only to those who are able to return their ‘gift.’ Christians, on the other hand, give to those in need out of a sense of their own need to give. They give to debtors out of a sense of their own debt, which has been forgiven. They give to the unlovable out of the abundance of love which they have received.”[1] As I watched my children open up their Christmas presents over many years, and now get to watch my grandchildren do that. I have to agree with Jesus finally. It is more “blessed” to give that to receive.

[1] Haley, John. 1998. “The Christian Gives to Those in Need.” Edited by Brent Lewis. Christianity Magazine, 1998.

1 Corinthians 12:12f

Stop The Insanity!

Paul tells us that we are all part of the same body. 1 Corinthians 12:12 says, “For just as the body is one and has many members, and all the members of the body, though many, are one body, so it is with Christ.” Each part of the body has its own function under the headship of Christ. A body is “healthy” when each part fulfills its particular role. But the body of believers in Corinth was not healthy. A visitor to a mental hospital was astonished to note that there were only three guards watching over a hundred dangerous inmates. He asked his guide, “Don’t you fear that these people will overpower the guards and escape?” “No,” was the reply. “Lunatics never unite.” I’m sorry to say that I’ve met a lot of “lunatics” in the church. Being unable to unite in an effort with others, they focus on their own interests and lose the impact of what it’s like to work together for the accomplishment of a common goal. Not only do they miss the thrill of seeing God work through the concerted effort of the body, but they also lose the strength, support, and joys that sharing their lives with others will bring.

There is strength and safety in the plurality of effort. For safety reasons, mountain climbers rope themselves together when climbing a mountain. That way, if one climber should slip and fall, he would not fall to his death. He would be held by the others until he could regain his footing. The church ought to be like that. When one member slips and falls, the others should hold him up until he regains his footing. We are all roped together by the Holy Spirit.

Paul often refers to the church as a body. Each of us fills a different role; some are hands, some are feet, some are noses, some are eyes, and some are mouths (See 1 Corinthians 12:12-18).  In his Illustrations for Biblical Preaching, Michael Green gets even more specific. He says, “In any flesh-and-bones body, there are a variety of cells. There are nerve cells, blood cells, muscle cells, and many others, each having a distinct function. The body operates smoothly, not because the cells get together and vote on what to do, but because each one does what it was designed to do. It is the function of the head to bring all these different functions together so that the body operates effectively, as each cell gives itself to the task of functioning according to its design. Certainly, the body would not operate properly if its cells chose to go their own way. Do you know what we call a rebellion of the cells of your stomach? We call it indigestion! A revolt of your brain cells is called insanity. Any time the cells in our body don’t operate properly, it means that the body is sick, that something is wrong with it. Many of the problems in the church today are a result of our forgetting that the church is a body with a head, Jesus Christ.” Tidwell concludes, “Christ, the Head of this body, gives it unity, direction, balance, and control.”[1]

[1] Tidwell, Charles. 1985. Church Administration: Effective Leadership for Ministry. Nashville, TN: B&H Publishing Group.

1 Corinthians 3:6

God Gives The Increase

When referring to the way he and Apollos were co-laborers for Christ, Paul resorts to an agricultural analogy. He may very well have been thinking of Jesus’ teaching regarding Himself being the vine and believers being the branches and that no branch can accomplish anything in and of itself. It must be nourished through its connection to the vine. In 1 Corinthians 3:6, Paul writes, “I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.” Agreed, God doesn’t even need Paul or Apollos. He could do it all by Himself. I suspect He still acts in special ways in individual lives to open their hearts and minds to the gospel. One commentary says, “God is, of course, able to communicate, act, and react via extraordinary means, but far more often, he delights in ordinary, mundane means. In this, the commentators see a prime example of Paul’s words to the Corinthians, that he “planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth” (1 Cor 3:6). While human beings have real responsibility, the progress and outcome of events is ultimately dependent on the Lord.”[1] The tendency in Corinth, unfortunately, was to focus on the human contribution to the process and not the Lord’s.

I like what Ogilvie says in The Preacher’s Commentary, “They were not in competition with each other but were partners in a common venture, team members in a common task. And while their work was very important, it was subordinate to the role of God, who provided the increase.” Paul’s focus in this passage clearly infers that divisions in the church “had been caused by giving more devotion to the servants than to the Lord.” This is still a major problem in the church today. It might even be worse because of the mass media. We have TV preachers, radio preachers, and publishers promoting popular preachers. Ogilvie goes on to say, “The personality cult has been a part of our secular life in politics, business, education, and medicine. In each of these fields, strong personalities gather around themselves, disciples to their way of thinking and acting. This fact of life has affected the church and has had a divisive effect. It results in ministers, churches, and denominations competing with each other. The divided church is created by our forgetting that we are all servants and ministers of the one Lord and that both the field and the harvest are His.”

I cannot help but think also that we today are fellow workers with Apollos and Paul. Even though thousands of years have passed, the same “building” is being worked on today that they began in the first century. Christ is still the foundation, and we’re all building the superstructure. Actually, Christ is building His church; we are co-workers together with Him. This work will continue until the Lord returns. We’re not building something new or different. Paul warns the builders not to attempt to lay any other foundation than the one already laid: Christ Jesus.  We are all in this together all the way back to Paul and forward with all those who will come after us. Throughout all history, some will plant, some will fertilize, some will water, and some will harvest. But we must never forget that “it’s God who gives the increase.”

[1] Chung-Kim, Esther, Todd R. Hains, Timothy George, Scott M. Manetsch, and Brannon Ellis, eds. 2014. Acts: New Testament. Vol. VI. Reformation Commentary on Scripture. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

2 Corinthians 3:9

God’s Field

In the first ten verses of 1 Corinthians Chapter 3, Paul focuses on the divisiveness of the church at Corinth and exhorts the believers to learn to work together for the accomplishment of God’s mission.  1 Corinthians 3:9 says, “For we are God’s fellow workers. You are God’s field, God’s building.” We are all working together in the field, but the field is God’s field, not our own. Paul wants the church to grasp the synergistic relation of the different apostolic workers. They share the burden, and Paul invites the various members of the church to join in the calling to work together for the common goal of making disciples. What matters, looking back at Jesus’ use of the vine and branches analogy, is the fruitful cultivation of the harvest. Paul wants them, as he and Apollos and Cephus have done, to set aside their individual preferences to form a more cohesive union towards the accomplishment of God’s mission.

I like what Hays says in the commentary, “It is easy to give lip service to this principle, but hard to live out its practical implications in the church.” It’s so easy for us to become embroiled in turf wars instead of working cooperatively to cultivate God’s field. When that happens, the field becomes endlessly subdivided into unproductive isolated efforts, with each part doing its own thing.  The role of individuals is not nearly as important as the participation of each part of the body. When we all focus on watching out that no one else interferes with our little patch of the field, it destroys the overall effort.  As Hays continues, he says that Paul is saying to his readers, then and now, “No, don’t you understand that the whole field belongs to God and that we are called to work together to bring in the eschatological harvest? Individual leaders are insignificant; they are just field hands.” We are all just field hands. Gibson writes, “Our labor need not be limited to just planting. We can also be watering, nurturing, and weeding. In all of this, the laborer must realize that he works in God’s field with God’s seed, which grows by God’s power. We accomplish nothing of ourselves; it is all to God’s glory and praise.” He then quotes Paul from 1 Corinthians, “I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase. So then neither he who plants is anything, nor he who waters, but God who gives the increase.”[1] Because of our pride, we’d rather focus on our differences rather than the thing that should unite us. We find it almost impossible to set aside our particular preferences in order to work together.

While in Israel, we visited the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem.  There’s probably no better example (except maybe the 1st-century church at Corinth) of the foolishness of turf wars and bitter jealousies.  The Church of the Holy Sepulchre is built on one of the two suggested sights for the burial of Jesus.  Although the garden tomb seems to be the more likely place, tradition has supported the Church of the Holy Sepulchre as the site. Today, this church is divided into different sections under the jurisdictions of the different Christian groups that want to claim a piece of the purportedly holy place: Greek Orthodox, Armenian Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Ethiopian Orthodox, and so forth.

[1] Gibson, Marc W. 1997. “In Labor—A Sower.” Edited by Brent Lewis. Christianity Magazine, 1997.

John 19:34

Blood And Water

When the soldiers came to break the legs of the three hanging on the cross to finish them off, they found that Jesus was already dead.  They did not need to break his legs to accelerate the dying process, but John 19:34 tells us, “But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water.” Commentators have gone to great lengths to identify the symbolic meaning of the “blood and water” that flowed from Jesus’ side when pierced by the spear. Wiersbe suggests that blood and water illustrate two aspects of salvation: blood to atone for the guilt of sin and water to wash away the stain of sin. The blood speaks of justification, and the water of sanctification. The two must always go together, for those who have trusted the blood of Christ to save them should live clean lives before a watching world.  In this respect, others have said that the blood represents the sacrifice for sin, and the water represents the water of purification.

However, others see the water differently since, in John, water is symbolic of the Holy Spirit. The death of the Saviour means a life-giving flow: blood for the cleansing from sin and water for the representation of the new life in the Spirit. Some suggest it serves to fulfill Old Testament prophecies concerning the piercing of the Messiah. ( Ps 34:20; Zech 12:10).  Others suggest it refers to the healing power of Christ. The name of the soldier who pierced Christ’s side was Longinus. According to tradition, blood and water spattered his eyes, and he was immediately healed of “distemper” in his eyes. Much legend has been built around such fables, which involved searching for the Holy Grail & other notions of achieving eternal life.

Others see reference to the two ordinances of the Church. The Blood is symbolized during Communion with the cup of wine. The water signifies the water used in baptism. Dr. W. Stroud (Physical Cause of the Death of Christ ) argues that this fact proves that the spear pierced the left side of Jesus near the heart and that Jesus had died literally of a broken heart since blood was mixed with water. Dr. Stuart Bergsma agrees and says, “To the effect that blood and water flowing from a spear wound could have only come from a ruptured heart.”[1] Regardless of Blood & Water’s symbolic nature, never forget it was for you and Me! He didn’t swoon! He didn’t fake it! He indeed died on the cross to pay the penalty for our sins and purchase a place in heaven for us, which he offers as a free gift to all who receive it by faith. We have been born again. Valerie Geer compares it to childbirth. She writes, “Blood and water came out of me also. My water broke, and amniotic fluid mixed with blood flowed out of my womb and down my legs. In pain and labor, with much toil, I brought forth a child. My own body was torn asunder in an episode of great suffering. This is the story of life. Life out of the blood and water that flowed mingled down. Life is born out of self-sacrifice. I am speaking of childbirth, yes, but even more, I am speaking of the redemption of humanity.”[2]

[1] Duffield, Guy P., and Nathaniel M. Van Cleave. 1983. Foundations of Pentecostal Theology. Los Angeles, CA: L.I.F.E. Bible College.

[2] Geer, Valerie. 2015. “Blood & Water Flowed: Becoming New through the Feminine Imagery of Redemption.” Mutuality Magazine, 2015.

1 Chronicles 4:10

The Prayer Of Jabez

Bruce Wilkinson’s little book, “The Prayer of Jabez,” is based on this one verse in 1 Chronicles chapter four. Verse 10 says: “Now Jabez called on the God of Israel, saying, ‘Oh that You would bless me indeed and enlarge my border, and that Your hand might be with me, and that You would keep me from harm that it may not pain me!’ And God granted him what he requested.” Jabez is said to be more noble than his brothers. That seems to be reflected in his prayer. According to some Jewish historians, Jabez was an eminent doctor in the law whose reputation drew so many scribes around him that a town was called by his name.  His mother named him Jabez, which means suffering because that’s what he caused her at his birth. Yet, in his life, his mother must have been delighted by the joy he brought her as a man of God.

Wilkinson’s book is not without its critics. Some argue that it displaces the prayer that Jesus taught His disciples to pray. That one highlights a humble spirit, wanting nothing more than daily bread and to be kept from temptation. One writer says of Wilkinson’s book, “Readers of the book may come to imagine God as a cosmic Santa Clause, merrily doling out gifts to any individual who asks. And asks. And asks. It is more edifying to read The Prayer of Jabez as a wry leavening of Scripture than as a motivational mantra or a magical success formula. Besides, the church already has a model prayer.”[1]

I appreciate the criticism, yet Jabez’s prayer is in the form of a vow. It seems to have been prayed as a preliminary to embarking on a major task that God had given him. The task may have been occupying his portion of the Land, ousting the pagan inhabitants, and setting up the worship of the one true God. He prayed, “that it may not grieve me” or “that I may have no more sorrow” may be an allusion to his name.  He prays, “Let me not experience the grief which my name implies.” The important thing to notice here is that Jabez did not look to his own strength, ability, or wisdom to live his life or accomplish a task. He trusted in God as His prayer testifies. Whether he was simply praying for God’s particular blessing on his life as a whole or for the success of a particular undertaking, Jabez enjoyed a remarkable degree of prosperity, and God, in this instance, proved that He was not only the hearer but the answerer of prayer. He still is!

[1] Sailer, William, J. Creighton Christman, David C. Greulich, Harold P. Scanlin, Stephen J. Lennox, and Phillip Guistwite. 2012. Religious and Theological Abstracts. Myerstown, PA: Religious and Theological Abstracts.

sewa motor jogja
© Chuck Larsen 2019. Powered by WordPress.